Running biomechanics errors and their fixes

Running is one of the most popular forms of physical activity around the world. Yet, prevalence of running biomechanics
related injuries remain high in spite of advancement in coaching practices, running shoes and running practices.

The most common pathologies faced by runners are Achilles tendinopathy, Calf strain, Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome, Patellar Tendinopathy and Hamstring strain.

Running biomechanics related injuries are multifactorial – ranging from non-modifiable factors such as gender, previous injuries, unforeseen events to modifiable factors such as running shoes, movement patterns, training loads, anthropometry and running surface.

While these injuries cannot be prevented altogether, here are some running biomechanics errors that can be addressed to reduce the risk of injuries.

Common running biomechanics errors

1. Overstriding + Low Cadence

runnning biomechanics :overstriding

 

How It Looks

Why It Matters

What It Often Reflects

Corrections

Foot lands well ahead of COM

Higher peak braking forces prospectively linked to injury risk

Long-stride preferred pattern

Cadence retraining (+5–10%)

Knee extended at contact

+5–10% cadence reduces PFJ load & braking forces

Quad-dominant mechanics

Hip + knee extensor strengthening

Cadence <160–165 spm

Shorter step length reduces knee joint stress

Underuse of hip extensors

Cues: “Land under hips”, “Quicker steps”

     

Education on reducing braking rather than “fixing heel strike”

2. Dynamic Knee Valgus / Hip Adduction / Pelvic Drop

runnning biomechanics : Excessive Pronation

How It Looks

Why It Matters

What It Often Reflects

Corrections

Knee collapses medially

Increased hip adduction & pelvic drop seen in PFPS

Low hip abductor capacity

Hip abductor strengthening

Contralateral pelvic drop

Hip abductor strengthening reduces pelvic drop (RCTs)

Impaired single-leg control

Frontal-plane gait retraining

Narrow step width or “crossover”

Predictive of injury in female runners

Narrow step width

Step width adjustment

 

 

 

 

Cues: “Run on train tracks”, “Keep pelvis level”

 

3. High-Impact / “Loud” Landing

How It Looks

Why It Matters

What It Often Reflects

Corrections

Audible foot slap

Higher loading rates associated with MTSS & tibial stress fractures

Overstriding

Impact gait retraining (auditory/visual feedback)

Large vertical impact peak

Impact-focused gait retraining reduces tibial shock

Stiff ankle strategy

Cadence increase

High tibial acceleration

Lowering impact does not worsen running economy

Reduced shock absorption

 

 

Calf–soleus strengthening (especially bent-knee raises)

 

 

Low tissue capacity

Cues: “Run quietly”, “Soft landings”

 

4. Narrow Step Width / Crossover Gait

runnning biomechanics : Narrow Step Width

How It Looks

Why It Matters

What It Often Reflects

Corrections

Feet land on or

across midline

Narrow width increases hip adduction and pelvic drop

Motor strategy habit (often seen in novice runners)

Step width increase (5–8 cm wider)

Feet land on or across midline

Higher ITB strain and greater tibial bending stress

Low frontal-plane hip stability

Mirror feedback to reduce crossover

 

Linked to PFPS and lateral hip pain

 

Hip abductor Strengthening

 

 

 

 

Cues: “Land under the same-side hip”

 

5. Excessive Pronation / Medial Foot Collapse

runnning biomechanics : Excessive Pronation

How It Looks

Why It Matters

What It Often Reflects

Corrections

Midfoot cllapses medially

Excessive pronation associated with MTSS, plantar fasciopathy & tibial rotation stress

Medial arch weakness

Foot intrinsic strengthening (short-foot, toe-mobility drills)

Tibial internal rotation visibly increases

Greater foot mobility correlates with higher injury incidence

Reduced tibialis posterior capacity

Tibialis posterior strengthening

Arch height drops under load

 

Foot-intrinsic weakness

Step width or cadence modifications to reduce medial load

 

 

 

Footwear guidance (not as a primary fix)

 

6. Pelvic Over-Rotation / Excessive Trunk Rotation

How It Looks

Why It Matters

What It Often Reflects

Corrections

Arms cross midline

Increases shear at spine & pelvis

Low trunk control

Anti-rotation training (Pallof press, carries)

Torso rotates excessively

Associated with low back pain in runners

Weak obliques and deep stabilisers

Cueing: “Arms forward-back,

not side-to-side”

Lower limb “scissor pattern”

Often coexists with asymmetrical hip mechanics

Crossover gait

Widen step width

 

 

 

Strengthening glutes/rotational control

 

7. Late Heel Lift / Limited Ankle Stiffness

How It Looks

Why It Matters

What It Often Reflects

Corrections

Heel stays on the ground longer than ideal

Reduced ankle stiffness reduces running economy

Weak plantar flexors (especially soleus)

Soleus-dominant strengthening (bent-knee calf raise progressions)

Low vertical

stiffness

Associated with calf–Achilles overload due to compensatory propulsion patterns

Limited ankle stiffness

during midstance

Plyometrics (pogo jumps, hops) to increase ankle stiffness

Knee stays flexed too long

 

 

Cadence increase to reduce overloading

 

 

The easiest way to assess and identify all these biomechanical issues is through a running gait analysis. Modern day technology now offers portable, accurate and cost-effective solutions for running analysis. To launch running analysis at your center, contact us today!

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

GAYATRI SURESH (PT)

Gayatri Suresh (PT) is a Biomechanist who has completed her B.P.Th from DES College of Physiotherapy and M.P.T (Biomechanics) from SRM College of Physiotherapy, SRMIST. Her field of clinical expertise is in movement assessments through video analysis. Apart from her work at Auptimo, she works as a Clinical Specialist at Rehabilitation Research and Device Development, IIT Madras. She has won gold medals for her Research presentations and for securing First rank with distinction in her MPT degree respectively.

References for common running biomechanics errors

The information found within this site is for general information only and should not be treated as a substitute for professional advice from a licensed medical practitioner. Any application of exercises and diagnostic tests suggested is at the reader’s sole discretion and risk.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *