Analyzing the gait of injured runners : Overstriding

Overstriding

Running is a wildly popular sport. It is a great form of exercise for both body and mind and it can be done almost anywhere – all you need is a comfortable pair of sneakers. Unfortunately, this sudden increase in running has also led to an exponential increase in running related injuries. 

As physiotherapists, this is where we come in. From  strength training to stretching to foam rolling, we use different techniques to keep injuries it bay. But lets face it. We all know that runners can be tricky patients. We can do everything right with them, but they still manage to find a way to get that pain back. Are we missing something?

We haven’t watched them run! What our injured runners really need is gait retraining.

 

Having a good understanding of joint motion and biomechanics, physical therapists are well suited to help runners improve their form. Improving running form can mean two things. 

First would be to eliminate any physical limitation in the body(a tight calf, a weak ligament etc.). The other factor would be improving running technique (increased step length, reduced cadence etc.) to eliminate any bio-mechanical fault that may lead to injuries.  Incorporating these methods of gait retraining into our practice with runners will not only help our patients recover from injury faster, but it will also allow them to run more efficiently. Your runners will be eternally grateful for your expertise.

A running analysis A running assessment is a simple, yet highly informative component of a runner’s evaluation. While a standard PT assessment is still recommended for a running patient, I cannot emphasize the running portion enough. All you need are a treadmill or (a long track) and a smartphone with a slo-mo feature. There are a few good software that you can use, such as GaitON or Dartfish , but a simple phone camera will do the trick if these applications are not available to you. Next time you have a runner come into your clinic, have them hop on the treadmill for five minutes and take a slow motion video. Within five minutes, you will have enough information to identify red flags in the majority of runners.

To get a better understanding of gait, you can shoot videos from different views. Typically, videos from posterior, lateral and the anterior views are required. While recording, ensure that the runners's entire body is in the frame.

Your next step is to review the video with the patient. From personal experience, runners would really appreciate this. It is helpful for them to see what they look like running. The individualized approach makes it more likely that they will remember your advice and also buy into your treatment plan. Just make sure to avoid PT jargon in your explanation (i.e. dynamic knee valgus, pelvic drop etc.)

Running form evaluation

Since we don’t always have much time in the clinic, I will be talking about the major issues that you will find in a number of runners. First in that list is ‘Overstriding’. This is a fault that will be present in 60–70% of runners that visit you, especially novice runners. Here is how you can detect if a patient is overstriding.

#Theoverstriders

Overstriding can be picked up when reviewing the video taken in the sagittal plane. The term simply means that the runner is landing excessively ahead of the center of mass of the body(COM can be approximated at the center of the pelvis). Doing this often increases the stride length of the runner, hence the name ‘overstriding’.

This may sound efficient, but overstriding has been linked to a variety of running injuries including patellofemoral pain syndrome, iliotibial band syndrome, plantar fasciitis, achilles tendonitis and tibial stress fractures.

These injuries often result from excessive impact forces at the hip, knee and ankle joints, which accompany overstriding.

When examining video in the lateral view, there are several key elements that will alert you about overstriding. These include any combination of the following:

  • Increased vertical excursion of the center of mass(COM)
  • Reduced knee flexion angle at foot strike
  • Increased foot inclination angle foot strike 
  • Excessive horizontal distance between foot and COM at foot strike

Below is an example of an overstrider. In this photo you can clearly see that upon initial contact, the knee is almost fully extended and the foot exhibits a large foot inclination angle.

Overstriding

Runners with overstriding fault benefit from gait retraining that targets shortening stride length and increasing step rate. By simply taking more steps and therefore decreasing their stride length, the impact ground reaction forces can be decreased. This improve the chances of injury recovery and future injury prevention.

Cadence retraining

If a runner can learn to increase their step rate, their stride will shorten and the resultant impact forces will decrease. There is no magic number for step rate – it simply has to be higher than the runner’s originally preferred step rate. Increases as little as 5% have been shown to reduce joint compression forces and decrease risk of injury. This alteration in running mechanics has proven to be just as, if not more important, than a strengthening program.

There are several ways that we can help a runner increase step rate. Runners can use a metronome app to match their steps to a desired step rate, but they can also use their playlist to achieve this.

If used properly, a running evaluation can be a very valuable to your practice. It helps you understand how a physical limitation (e.g. flat feet) in the runner effects the entire body. Using tools like motion analysis software can increase the accuracy of this entire process by giving you a complete breakdown of the runner’s mechanics during the entire gait cycle.

After interacting with hundreds of clinicians, we crafted the running analysis protocol of GaitON with an aim to analyse a runner’s gait more effectively and easily. The protocol helps a clinician analyse the pelvis, hip, knee, foot and ankle joint motion during the running gait cycle. All the data is then well documented to a report with reference values! Click here to know more.

REFERENCES: 
1. Altman AR, Davis IS. Barefoot running: biomechanics and implications for running injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2012;11:244–50. [PubMed[]
2. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 9. Lippincott Williams and Williams; Philadelphia: 2013. []
3. Azevedo LB, Lambert MI, Vaughan CL, et al. Biomechanical variables associated with Achilles tendinopathy in runners. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:288–92. [PubMed[]
4. Ballas MT, Tytko J, Cookson D. Common overuse running injuries: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 1997;55:2473–84. [PubMed[]
5. Bonacci J, Saunders PU, Hicks A, et al. Running in a minimalist and light-weight shoe is not the same as running barefoot: a biomechanical study. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:387–92. [PubMed[]
6. Bonacci J, Vicenzino B, Spratford W, Collins P. Take your shoes off to reduce patellofemoral joint stress during running. Br J Sports Med. 2013 doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092160. [PubMed] [CrossRef[]Br J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;48(6):425–8. [PubMed[]
7. Cauthon DJ, Langer P, Coniglione TC. Minimalist shoe injuries: three case reports. Foot (Edinb) 2013;23:100–3. [PubMed[]
8. Chang WL, Shih YF, Chen WY. Running injuries and associated factors in participants of ING Taipei Marathon. Phys Ther Sport. 2012;13:170–4. [PubMed[]
9. Chumanov ES, Wille CM, Michalski MP, Heiderscheit BC. Changes in muscle activation patterns when running step rate is increased. Gait Posture. 2012;36:231–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed[]
10. Ciacci S, Di Michele R, Merni F. Kinematic analysis of the braking and propulsion phases during the support time in sprint running. Gait Posture. 2010;31:209–12. [PubMed[]
11. Daoud AI, Geissler GJ, Wang F, et al. Foot strike and injury rates in endurance runners: a retrospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:1325–34. [PubMed[]
12. Fellin RE, Manal K, Davis IS. Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running. J Appl Biomech. 2010 Nov;26(4):407–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed[]
13. Ferber R, Noehren B, Hamill J, Davis IS. Competitive female runners with a history of iliotibial band syndrome demonstrate atypical hip and knee kinematics. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40:52–8. [PubMed[]
14. Fields KB. Running injuries — changing trends and demographics. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011;10:299–303. [PubMed[]
15. Ford KR, Taylor-Haas JA, Genthe K, Hugentobler J. Relationship between hip strength and trunk motion in college cross-country runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:1125–30. [PubMed[]
16. Fredericson M, Misra AK. Epidemiology and aetiology of marathon running injuries. Sports Med. 2007;37:437–9. [PubMed[]
17. Gallo RA, Plakke M, Silvis ML. Common leg injuries of long-distance runners: anatomical and biomechanical approach. Sports Health. 2012;4:485–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed[]
18. Giandolini M, Horvais N, Farges Y, et al. Impact reduction through long-term intervention in recreational runners: midfoot strike pattern versus low-drop/low-heel height footwear. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113:2077–90. [PubMed[]
19. Giuliani J, Masini B, Alitz C, Owens BD. Barefoot-simulating footwear associated with metatarsal stress injury in 2 runners. Orthopedics. 2011;34:e320–3. [PubMed[]
20. Gruber AH, Umberger BR, Braun B, Hamill J. Economy and rate of carbohydrate oxidation during running with rearfoot and forefoot strike patterns. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2013;115:194–201. [PubMed[]
21. Hammer SR, Delp SL. Muscle contributions to fore-aft and vertical body mass center accelerations over a range of running speeds. J Biomech. 2013;46:780–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed[]
22. Hespanhol LC, Junior, Pena Costa LO, Lopes AD. Previous injuries and some training characteristics predict running-related injuries in recreational runners: a prospective cohort study. J Physiother. 2013;59:263–9. [PubMed[]
23. Hockenbury RT. Forefoot problems in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:S448–58. [PubMed[]
24. Hubbard TJ, Carpenter EM, Cordova ML. Contributing factors to medial tibial stress syndrome: a prospective investigation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:490–6. [PubMed[]
25. Kelsey JL, Bachrach LK, Procter-Gray E, et al. Risk factors for stress fracture among young female cross-country runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1457–63. [PubMed[]
26. Kindred J, Trubey C, Simons SM. Foot injuries in runners. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011;10:249–54. [PubMed[]
27. Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM. Acute and overuse injuries correlated to hours of training in master running athletes. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:671–6. [PubMed[]
28. Kong PW, Candelaria NG, Smith D. Comparison of longitudinal biomechanical adaptation to shoe degradation between the dominant and non-dominant legs during running. Hum Mov Sci. 2011;30:606–13. [PubMed[]
29. Lilley K, Stiles V, Dixon S. The influence of motion control shoes on the running gait of mature and young females. Gait Posture. 2013;37:331–5. [PubMed[]
30. Lisman P, O’Connor FG, Deuster PA, Knapik JJ. Functional movement screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:636–43. [PubMed[]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *